Prevention better than cure

FIGO position statement on opportunistic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer prevention strategy

https://tinyurl.com/4db8sj3y

The importance of pre-cancerous change in the fallopian tubes as a precursor to ovarian cancer has led to suggest that removal of the fallopian tubes at the time of other abdominal surgery is a significant protective measure.

Now FIGO, (The International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology) have issued a position statement saying they firmly support this.

Evidence for this position is linked to pilot studies in Canada which showed significant reduction in subsequent ovarian cancer rates when the tubes were removed at the time of hysterectomy, (this is not usual practice). 

In addition, an Austrian study showed good acceptance of additional surgery. When women facing gallbladder removal were offered tube resection, 60% accepted. The average increase in operating time was 13 minutes and there was no extra post-operative complication.

One less cause to worry

The impact of inter-cycle treatment delays on overall survival in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer

https://tinyurl.com/mrxpksk9

Many patients with ovarian cancer have interruption of their chemo. This may occur because of adverse side effects of treatment, or external factors such as other priorities and logistic issues.

This interruption may cause anxiety which can be expressed as concern that the chemo is less effective.

This retrospective study looked at more than 1500 women with advanced ovarian cancer first diagnosed during the period 2015-2019. The two-year survival for women who had an uninterrupted chemo course was compared to those whose chemo was unavoidably disrupted. Disruption is common with 37% having breaks of at least 7 days. No difference in survival was seen in the two groups.

Knowledge that chemo is just as effective despite interruption means that factors which affect the patient's quality of life can be addressed without fear of harm.

The real financial cost

Study Finds Nearly $70 Billion in Socioeconomic Losses Across 11 Countries Attributable to Ovarian Cancer

https://tinyurl.com/4spw37yz

Ovarian cancer is extremely costly to the individual, the state and the family of each patient. This study uses a true cost of illness approach to assess the annual economic burden of each case of ovarian cancer in high-, middle-, and low-income countries.

Factors included in this determination include cost of treatment, the opportunity cost of loss of productivity for the individual and the carers and the often-forgotten cost of unpaid carer time.

The sums are mind-boggling with an estimate of almost $70 Billion total annual expenditure and individual costs of up to 120 times the usual health expenditure per capita for low-income countries.

Obviously, there is concern about whether this is sustainable and shows the urgent need to reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer.

Alternative therapy ineffectual

Impact of metformin, statins, and beta blockers on survival in patients with primary ovarian cancer: combined analysis of four prospective trials of AGO-OVAR and ENGOT/GCIG collaborators

https://tinyurl.com/597m54hb

Anecdotal experience has previously suggested that off-label use of some commonplace drugs may improve survival for patients with ovarian cancer. This meta-analysis of 4 prospective randomised trials looks at the effect of some of these.

Data was obtained from the trials which recorded use of the additional drug treatment. The prime purpose of the trials having been assessment of efficacy of the enzyme inhibitor, Pazopanib. From the data, patients could be subdivided into two groups; those who had received additional drug therapy and those who had not.

Finding from the results show that use of off-label drugs was associated with greater co-morbidity. Neither metformin or statin therapy had any effect on survival. Use of betablockers had a negative effect, those patients had worse survival outcomes.